jump to navigation

Thomas Sowell Rebutts the National Debt Alarmists 9 March, 2007

Posted by stoptaxing in Economic Policy, federal.
trackback
 

 

Jewish World Review Nov. 25, 2004 / 12 Kislev, 5765 Thomas Sowell

 
 

A taxing experience

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | When liberals in the media or in politics start being alarmed about the national debt, it means just one thing: They want higher taxes. The thought of reducing spending would never cross their minds.
As we are endlessly reminded, the federal government’s debt has reached record levels during the Bush administration. That enables the liberal media to use their favorite word — “crisis” — and adds urgency to doing their favorite thing, raising taxes.
Since we have a larger population than ever and a larger national income than ever, it should hardly be surprising that we also have a larger national debt than ever. But what does it mean?
Donald Trump probably has a bigger debt than I do — and less reason to worry about it. Debt means nothing unless you compare it to your income or wealth.
How does our national debt today compare to our national income? It is lower than it was a decade ago, during the
Clinton administration, when liberals did not seem nearly as panicked as they seem today.

As a percentage of the national income, the national debt today is less than half of what it was in 1950 and about where it was in 1940 — back in those “earlier and simpler times.”
If someone were to produce a political dictionary, “crisis” would be defined as a desire to pass a law and “national debt” would be defined as a desire to raise taxes. And the two in combination would mean a desire to discredit the existing administration.
If it seems that raising taxes is the only way to reduce the national debt, at least when so much spending is mandated by “entitlement” programs, that only shows the need for an economic dictionary. “Taxes” is one of those treacherous words with more than one meaning, enabling politicians to shift back and forth between meanings when they talk.
Unless spending is reduced, then of course more tax revenues are necessary in order to reduce a deficit or bring down a debt. But tax revenues and tax rates are two different things, even though the same word — “taxes” — is used to refer to both.
What “tax cuts” cut is the tax rate. But tax revenues can rise, fall, or stay the same when tax rates are cut. Everything depends on what happens to income.
Tax revenues rose after the Kennedy tax cuts of the 1960s and the Reagan tax cuts of the 1980s because incomes rose. Incomes are likewise rising during the Bush administration today.
If Congress can just reduce the rate of increase in spending, rising tax revenues can reduce the deficit and eventually eliminate it. But of course that will not give liberals an excuse to raise tax rates or even to denounce “tax cuts for the rich.”
There was a time when the purpose of taxes was to pay for the inevitable costs of government. To the political left, however, taxes have long been seen as a way to redistribute income and finance other social experiments based on liberal ideology.
Given that agenda, it is hardly surprising that some of the biggest spending liberals can go into hysterics over the national debt, especially when that debt exists under a conservative administration of the opposite party.
This does not mean that nothing needs to be done about the national debt or about our tax system. A lot could be done about both — but it would not be what liberals want done.
Promoting the growth of the national economy would be one of the fastest and best ways of reducing the national debt. We could, for example, stop letting little bands of self-righteous activists stifle the building of homes or businesses under “open space” laws or stop the drilling of oil off-shore, on-shore, or anywhere else.
As for taxes, we could stop taxing productivity and start taxing consumption. After all, productivity is what makes a society more prosperous.
Someone who is adding to the total wealth of this country is not depriving you of anything. But someone who is consuming the nation’s wealth, without contributing anything to it, is. Yet our tax system penalizes those who are producing wealth in order to subsidize those who are only consuming it.
Tax reform is overdue, national debt or no national debt. Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in
Washington and in the media consider “must reading.” Sign up for the daily JWR update. It’s free. Just click
here.
JWR contributor Thomas Sowell, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, is author of several books, including his latest, “Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One.” (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.) To comment please click here. Thomas Sowell Archives © 2004, Creators Syndicate

 

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Benjamin - 16 January, 2008

Just a note about your mention of the national debt compared to national income being lower a decade ago… I believe this isn’t right, or perhaps we are working from conflicting sources of information. At the very least trending information of the national debt versus GDP has been omitted when it relevant to receive attention. I’ll just name one graph of the national debt versus GDP as shown here:

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

It shows the trend after world war 2, through 1980, into today. From 1980 to 1990 and from 2000 to 2010 the national debt versus GDP has positive slope.

2. what was the amount of the national debt on january 20 1980 - 25 April, 2008

[…] of the national … From 1980 to 1990 and from 2000 to 2010 the national debt versus GDP has …https://stoptaxing.wordpress.com/2007/03/09/thomas-sowell-rebutts-the-national-debt-alarmists/United States public debt – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia… Treasury, calculates the amount of […]

3. I must be wrong about Obammy... - Southern Maryland Community Forums - 13 July, 2008

[…] How many know… what the national debt means? Few! Dan Heller’s Opinon On the National Debt Thomas Sowell Rebutts the National Debt Alarmists Stop overTaxing Our People […]

4. Bush White House projects record deficit for 2009 - Southern Maryland Community Forums - 28 July, 2008

[…] Great… columns on this liberal scare… Thomas Sowell Rebutts the National Debt Alarmists Stop overTaxing Our People Walter E. Williams :: Townhall.com :: Trade Deficits: Good or […]

5. Http://1Stmerchant61I1.Thoughts.Com/ - 11 July, 2013

Hi there! I realize this is sort of off-topic but I needed
to ask. Does running a well-established website like yours take a lot of work?
I’m completely new to running a blog however I do write in my journal every day. I’d like to start a blog so I can easily share my experience and
views online. Please let me know if you have any recommendations
or tips for brand new aspiring blog owners. Thankyou!

6. Takecharge Small Business Loans Fast - 22 July, 2013

My brother recommended I might like this website. He used to be entirely right.
This put up actually made my day. You cann’t consider just how much time I had spent for this info! Thank you!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: