Is it time for a real stimulus bill? 27 August, 2009Posted by David Anderson in Economic Policy, Energy, Jobs.
add a comment
After the fiasco in February, the term stimulus bill is a dirty word. Yet, the recent CBO projections sustained high unemployment and larger deficits makes me think that a proper stimulus bill would be an investment. The projected deficit is up by two million million (trillion) dollars before new programs are taken into account because of poor economic performance. The real unemployment rate is said to be 16%. Instead of speaking about raising energy taxes to pay for global warming concerns, income taxes to pay for health reform, income taxes on the wealthy to pay for whatever, payroll taxes on workers to pay for health reform, and business taxes to pay for an aggressive retread liberal agenda, why not first go for economic stimulus?
I want real economic stimulus not the sham of Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, and every Special interest lobbyist birthday rolled into one bill. We know what works. Why don’t we do it?
First let’s stop holding up the oil drilling permits authorized under the Bush Administration and mandated by Congress. It will help create downward pressure on future oil prices and create well paying jobs. It will actually bring money into the government instead of spending money.
Let’s do the same for wind farms. While we are at it, let’s create energy enterprise zones where the manufacture of alternative energy qualifies for investment tax credits. Let’s give a huge reward for the better battery.
Second, Let’s continue the payroll tax credit for another year and make it for both the employee and the employer so that the cost of employment is cheaper.
Third, let’s try cash for appliances without the bureaucracy. Energy efficient appliances would help lower energy prices and stimulate the economy. The Cash for Clunkers program was a great idea to move people to more energy efficient cars, but it was very poor in execution. I would love to see the program done again, but if it is announced too early that would depress car purchases. It is best to let it go.
Fourth, ask the Fed to stop the payment of interest on excess reserves. It is stopping the free flow of money and dampening the vaunted multiplier effect.
Fifth, Just eliminate the income tax, payroll tax, and corporate income tax and implement the FAIR Tax. I know that won’t happen with this Congress. In spite of scores of economists saying it would be the best move possible.
Sixth, barring number 5, reinstate the Reagan era investment tax credit and give small and medium business accelerated depreciation options.
Seventh, Make December of 2009 a tax holiday from personal income and payroll taxes.
Eighth, Give huge prizes for the creation of the Better energy storage system, increasing the efficiency of solar panels to 18%, a more energy efficient way to extract shale oil, and a better nuclear waste recycling system.
Ninth, Extend the first time homebuyers tax credit for 5 years.
Tenth, exempt the first 2% of an interest rate in bonds or CD’s from income taxes.
Eleventh, Declare any county with unemployment and underemployment over 10% an enterprise zone where local businesses that expand will get a 5 year investment tax credit in addition to the general one proposed.
Finally, Break the foreclosure cycle by funding state programs that help people by loaning them money interest free to catch up on mortgage payments once they find a new job. Give the banks more incentive to negotiate by reforming the bankruptcy laws to what they were before Jimmy Carter exempted mortgage terms from being changed. Give the banks tax credits to make up for loses in the voluntary modifications.
These proposals would cost a lot less than anything discussed and could in fact be done with the 250 billion set aside for bank relief that the President is thinking of relinquishing. If you want sustained economic growth, you have to build a supply side strategy into the mix. The current stimulus is based solely on the demand side. You have to do both. It is like trying to fly flapping one wing.
Sarah Palin on Cap and Tax 14 July, 2009Posted by David Anderson in Economic Policy, Energy, Sarah Palin.
1 comment so far
Governor Sarah Palin wrote on the dangers of the Cap and Trade proposal in the Washington Post today.
I am deeply concerned about President Obama’s cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.
American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable energy. Particularly in Alaska, we understand the inherent link between energy and prosperity, energy and opportunity, and energy and security. Consequently, many of us in this huge, energy-rich state recognize that the president’s cap-and-trade energy tax would adversely affect every aspect of the U.S. economy.
There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our energy policy and become less dependent on foreign energy sources. But the answer doesn’t lie in making energy scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our energy needs and environmental challenges without destroying America’s economy.
Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up energy sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.
In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the energy sector, even more American jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of farming will certainly increase, driving down farm incomes while driving up grocery prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing and transportation will also increase.
The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.